Cranston

Cranston v. Wells Fargo Bank

Good Law
1965 Cal. LEXIS 261·42 Cal. Rptr. 447·62 Cal. 2d 432·398 P.2d 783
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 11, 1965S. F. No. 21566California1,031 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

McComb, J.

The State Controller has appealed from an order upholding the executor’s objections to the valuation placed upon United States treasury bonds by the California inheritance tax appraiser.

Facts: The decedent owned United States treasury bonds with a total par value of $2,200,000. On the date of her death, these bonds were worth in the over-the-counter market $1,872,-185.63.

The federal government, through the Internal Revenue Code or by the terms of the bonds, permits their value to be accelerated to par value by the death of the owner to the extent that the bonds are used to pay federal estate taxes. All the bonds were used by the executor for this purpose.

The California inheritance tax appraiser appraised the bonds at their par value, and the executor filed an objection, claiming that the over-the-counter figure was the correct valuation.

Question: Should United States treasury bonds that are redeemable at par value by an executor in payment of federal estate taxes be appraised, for the purpose of determining the California inheritance tax, at par value or at the price quoted in the over-the-counter bond market on the date of the decedent’s death?

For the purposes of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.