Shively

Shively v. Stewart

Good Law
1966 Cal. LEXIS 215·55 Cal. Rptr. 217·65 Cal. 2d 475·421 P.2d 65·28 A.L.R. 3d 1431
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1966Sac. No. 7756California2,027 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Traynob, J.

Petitioners John P. Shively and Seymour Smith, licensed physicians authorized to practice medicine and surgery in the State of California, brought this proceeding to compel issuance of subpoenas duces tecum to obtain depositions and documents from the Executive Secretary of the State Board of Medical Examiners and from the board's attorney prior to disciplinary hearings.

On May 20,1966, Wallace W. Thompson, executive secretary of the board, filed accusations against petitioners stating that they aided, abetted, attempted, offered to procure, and performed criminal abortions on named women on specified dates. The accusations initiated disciplinary proceedings that could result in the revocation of petitioners’ licenses to practice medicine (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 2360; Gov. Code, § 11503). Petitioners filed notices of defense and requested hearings. (Gov. Code, § 11506.) On June 6 the board set Dr. Shively’s hearing for July 25 and Dr. Smith’s for July 27. (Gov. Code, § 11509.)

On June 27 petitioners presented four subpoenas duces tecum to respondent hearing officer requesting prehearing depositions and production of documents. By letter dated the same day, the hearing officer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.