Alber

Alber v. Owens

Good Law
1967 Cal. LEXIS 342·59 Cal. Rptr. 117·66 Cal. 2d 790·427 P.2d 781
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 29, 1967Sac. No. 7791California4,100 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Sullivan, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of non-suit entered in an action for damages for personal injuries.

Viewing the evidence under the applicable rules (Blumberg v. M. & T. Inc. (1949) 34 Cal.2d 226, 229 [ 209 P.2d 1 ]; Estate of Lances (1932) 216 Cal. 397, 400 [ 14 P.2d 768 ]), we set forth the following pertinent facts. Plaintiff was the president and a co-owner of Alber & Van, Inc., a cement subcontractor for the construction of an apartment house complex. Charles Van Landingham, the other co-owner, was vice-president of the firm. Although the duties of the two men sometimes overlapped, generally speaking, plaintiff’s position was that of a manager and superintendent while Van Landingham’s was that of a foreman. Plaintiff’s duties were to estimate the job, assign the work, and act basically as a coordinator. He was a working employee of the firm, receiving a weekly salary of $200; he did “physical work” on the jobs and in addition to his other duties “would go out and help pour on the jobs”; he was a member of “the union.” Defendants were the own *792 ers, developers and the general contractor-supervisor of the project.

On the day of the accident here involved, Rex Walker, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.