Corn

Corn v. State Bar

Good Law
1968 Cal. LEXIS 178·67 Cal. Rptr. 401·68 Cal. 2d 461·439 P.2d 313
Supreme Court of CaliforniaApril 19, 1968L. A. No. 29411California2,035 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of Disciplinary Board II of the State Bar of California that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years.

Questions: First. Does the evidence sustain the finding of culpability on the part of petitioner ?

Yes. The burden is upon one seeking a review of a recommendation of a disciplinary board to show that its findings are not supported by the evidence or that its recommendation is erroneous or unlawful. (McKinney v. State Bar, 62 Cal.2d 194, 195 [2] [ 41 Cal.Rptr. 665 , 397 P.2d 425 ].) In the present case, the record discloses that petitioner has not sustained this burden.

The record shows that in December 1964 petitioner was employed to represent Mr. Lawrence Symonds in a bankruptcy proceeding. The agreed fee was $200, plus $2 for forms and $50 for court costs. An additional $50 fee was later *463 agreed upon as a result of a necessary amendment to the petition for bankruptcy, making a total due by Mr. Symonds of $302. At the time petitioner was employed, he was paid $50, which Mr. Symonds had obtained as an advance from his employer.

Mr. Symonds ’ wife had formerly been married to a Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.