Granado

Granado v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
1968 Cal. LEXIS 249·69 Cal. 2d 399·71 Cal. Rptr. 678·445 P.2d 294·33 Cal. Comp. Cases 647
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 4, 1968S. F. No 22599California2,658 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Peters, J.

Petitioner seeks annulment of a decision after reconsideration by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board which apportioned liability for temporary disability compensation and medical treatment subsequent to April 1, 1966, 50 percent to respondent carrier and 50 percent to petitioner. The basis of the apportionment was a neck injury not industrially related suffered August 1961 and a subsequent industrial injury to the neck suffered April 13, 1965.

Petitioner urges :(1) temporary disability is not apportion-able; (2) medical treatment is not apportionable; and (3) even assuming that in a proper case apportionment might be permitted, the record does not support apportionment here. The first two contentions are meritorious.

Section 4663 of the Labor Code provides: “In case of aggravation of any disease existing prior to a compensable injury, compensation shall be allowed only for the proportion of the disability due to the aggravation of such prior disease which is reasonably attributed to the injury.” In cases involving permanent disability, it is settled that the section must be read in light of the rule that an employer takes the employee as he finds him at the time of…

dissent Opinion

McComb, J.

I dissent. I would affirm the judgment.

The petition of the respondent board for a rehearing was denied October 30, 1968. McComb, J., was of the opinion that the petition should be granted.

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.