Youngman

Youngman v. Nevada Irrigation District

Good Law
1969 Cal. LEXIS 329·70 Cal. 2d 240·74 Cal. Rptr. 398·449 P.2d 462
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 29, 1969Sac. No. 7829California3,739 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Mosk, J.

Plaintiffs in this action are William Youngman, an employee of the Nevada Irrigation District, and Local 1245 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (hereafter IBEW), which represents employees of the district. Defendants are the district and its directors. Plaintiffs filed a complaint asserting that the district’s employees were entitled to salary increases in 1965 on the basis of merit, that the district had entered into an implied and an express contract to grant such increases, but that it had refused to do so. Defendants filed a demurrer specifying both general and special grounds, and it was sustained by the trial court without leave to amend. Plaintiffs appeal from the ensuing judgment.

The first amended complaint sets forth five causes of action. The first cause of action asserts that there is an implied contract between plaintiffs and the district under which defendants were required to grant the salary increases; the second alleges that because of certain representations made by the district during wage negotiations with the IBEW and relied upon by plaintiffs the district is estopped from refusing to grant the increases. In the third cause of action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.