Eleazer

Eleazer v. Superior Court

Good Law
1 Cal. 3d 847·1970 Cal. LEXIS 354·83 Cal. Rptr. 586·464 P.2d 42
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1970L. A. No. 29681California2,715 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Tobriner, J.

Defendant Joseph Eleazer seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of Los Angeles County from proceeding to try him on a charge of unlawful sale of seconal in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11912. Evidence at the preliminary hearing showed that a paid police informer was a material witness to the alleged sale. The police disclosed the name of the witness, but denied any knowledge of his address or of any way in which he could be contacted. For the reasons hereinafter stated we hold that when an informer becomes a material witness to the crime, the prosecution must demonstrate that it has attempted in good faith to locate him; the duty to disclose the identity of the informer cannot be evaded by deliberate failure to acquire information necessary to find him. Nevertheless, since previous California cases have not expressly imposed such a duty, we have concluded that the instant case should not be dismissed without presently affording the People an opportunity to comply with our ruling.

The district attorney filed an information charging defendant with an unlawful sale of seconal on April 8, 1969. At the preliminary hearing Officer Paniccia…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.