In re Cooper

Good Law
1971 Cal. LEXIS 249·5 Cal. 3d 256·95 Cal. Rptr. 646·486 P.2d 174
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 1, 1971L.A. No. 29838California307 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

*257 Opinion

Grant Burr Cooper, admitted to practice in 1927, pleaded guilty and was convicted on two counts of a federal grand jury indictment charging him with contempt of court ( 18 U.S.C. § 401 ). One count (count 3) charged him with “wilfully and knowingly” violating rule 6 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by obtaining and using recorded grand jury testimony that had not yet been released from the secrecy provisipns of that rule. The other count (count 4) charged him with misbehaving in the presence of a federal court and so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice, in that during an inquiry by that court concerning the grand jury transcripts obtained in violation of rule 6, he “knowingly and wilfully” made specified false statements concerning the source from which he obtained those transcripts. The federal court imposed a $500 fine on each count. We referred the matter to the State Bar for a hearing, report and recommendation on the question whether the facts and circumstances surrounding the commission of the offenses to which Cooper pleaded guilty involved moral turpitude 2 and, if so, what discipline should be imposed. Following a hearing, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.