Martinez

Martinez v. Newton

Good Law
106 Cal. Rptr. 105·1973 Cal. LEXIS 255·8 Cal. 3d 756·505 P.2d 529
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1973L.A. No. 30103California300 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Petitioner Leo Martinez, in an original proceeding before this court, seeks a writ of mandate to compel respondent Jane Newton, City Clerk of the City of Santa Barbara, to file his nomination papers and place his name on the ballot as a candidate for the Santa Barbara City Council in the election to take place on April 17, 1973. Petitioner has been a state resident since July 15, 1942, and a qualified elector of the City of Santa Barbara for more than one year.

Respondent contends that she does not have a duty to accept petitioner’s nomination papers because petitioner has not complied with section 501 of the Santa Barbara City Charter, which provides:

It is settled that a four-year residence requirement for the office of city council violates the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution. (Zeilenga v. Nelson (1971) 4 Cal.3d 716 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 602 , 484 P.2d 578 ]; Camara v. Mellon (1971) 4 Cal.3d 714 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 601 , 484 P.2d 577 ].)

Petitioner also attacks sections 10202 and 10210 of the Elections Code which provide for placing the incumbent’s name first on the ballot. For the reasons stated in Mexican-American Political…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.