Milan
People v. Milan
Opinion
lead Opinion
Burke, J.
Michael Milan was found guilty by a jury of first degree murder of Keith Burney, kidnaping Burney for the purpose of robbery with *189 bodily harm, first degree robbery of Burney, attempted, murder of Horace Robert, and first degree robbery of Raymond Lester. The jury fixed the penalty at death for the murder and at fife imprisonment without possibility of parole for the kidnaping, and the court imposed prison sentences for the other crimes. 1 A motion for a new trial was denied, and defendant’s automatic appeal is now before us. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).)
Defendant contends that the court erred in admitting certain evidence, in instructing the jury, and in denying his challenge to the petit jury panel. We have concluded that none of the contentions can be upheld. However, the judgment must be modified to provide for a penalty of life imprisonment instead of death for the murder in accord with our holding in People v. Anderson, 6 Cal.3d 628 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 152 , 493 P.2d 880 ]. (See also Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 [ 33 L.Ed.2d 346 , 92 S.Ct. 2726 ].) 2 Certain modifications of the judgment are also required as a result of the proscription in Penal Code section…
concurrence Opinion
McComb, J.
I concur in the opinion, except that, for the reasons expressed in my dissenting opinion in People v. Anderson, 6 Cal.3d 628, 657 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 152 , 493 P.2d 880 ], I dissent from that part of the modification of' the judgment that provides a punishment of life imprisonment instead of death on the murder count. (See Cal. Const., art. I, § 27.)