Silverton

Silverton v. State Bar

Good Law
121 Cal. Rptr. 596·14 Cal. 3d 517·1975 Cal. LEXIS 301·535 P.2d 724
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 3, 1975L.A. No. 30359; L.A. No. 30370California2,093 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

*519 Opinion

This is a proceeding to review recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (Board) in L.A. No. 30359 that petitioner be disbarred and in L.A. No. 30370 that he be suspended from the practice of law for six months.

In April 1972 petitioner was convicted of one count of conspiracy to obtain money by false pretenses and to present a fraudulent insurance claim and one count of soliciting another to commit or join in the commission of grand theft. His conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeal in an unpublished opinion; and thereafter, on November 9, 1972, upon a finding that the crimes involved moral turpitude, this court suspended him from the practice of law.

The local administrative committee, after a hearing, recommended that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for five years, retroactive to December 10, 1972, and that two years of the suspension be stayed upon compliance with stated conditions. The Board, however, upon an independent review of the evidence, recommended, by a vote of eleven to one, with one abstention, that petitioner be disbarred.

The felony complaint charging petitioner with the crimes of which he was convicted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.