In re Adams

Good Law
122 Cal. Rptr. 73·14 Cal. 3d 629·1975 Cal. LEXIS 311·536 P.2d 473
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 23, 1975Crim. No. 17993California2,588 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Richardson, J.

*632 Opinion

In this case, we consider whether the statutory proscription against multiple punishment (Pen. Code, § 654) applies to the simultaneous transportation of different kinds of illegal narcotics and drugs. We have concluded that where, as in the instant "case, different kinds of drugs are simultaneously transported in one, indivisible transaction, with the single intent and objective of delivering them to another person, only one act of illegal transportation occurs. It follows that petitioner Adams’ multiple count sentences must be modified as set forth below.

On February 17, 1970, Smith, a state narcotics agent, had under surveillance the Redondo Sea Inn, the temporary residence of petitioner’s codefendant, Gregory. About 7 p.m. Smith observed petitioner drive into the inn’s parking lot, park his car next to Gregory’s car, and enter the inn. Twenty minutes later, petitioner and Gregory left the inn, opened the trunks of their cars and transferred an attaché case and numerous plastic bags from petitioner’s car to Gregory’s car. Later that same evening Gregory met with Miller, an undercover narcotics agent, to complete a previously arranged sale of 30,000 amphetamine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.