Newton

Newton v. State Bar

Good Law
189 Cal. Rptr. 372·1983 Cal. LEXIS 155·33 Cal. 3d 480·658 P.2d 735
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 1983L.A. No. 31562California1,250 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

We review the recommendation of the State Bar Court that petitioner Leonard A. Newton be disciplined for wilful failure to communicate with clients and failure to perform services for which he was retained. The review department has recommended that we suspend Newton from the prac *482 tice of law for five years, but stay execution, placing him on probation for that period. Recommended conditions of probation include one year of actual suspension and a requirement that Newton obtain psychiatric or psychological help within 45 days of our order. The review department has further recommended that Newton report quarterly to the State Bar that he is continuing to seek such help, unless the psychiatrist or psychologist determines that it is no longer needed. Resumption of practice after the one-year suspension is, however, not contingent on progress in the psychiatric treatment.

Although the allegations against Newton appear to be supported by the evidence, we conclude that the State Bar has proceeded incorrectly and order that it should initiate proceedings under Business and Professions Code section 6007, subdivision (b), to determine whether Newton, because of mental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.