Kern County Department of Human Services v. Debbie H.

Good Law
19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 544·1993 Cal. LEXIS 2498·5 Cal. 4th 295·93 Daily Journal DAR 7070·851 P.2d 826
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 3, 1993No. S025592California5,556 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Panelli, J.

This is one of several cases we have taken to resolve issues involving juvenile dependency proceedings pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 et seq. 1 The issue we address in this case is whether the statutory framework gives the juvenile court discretion to consider returning the minors to the parent at the section 366.26 selection and implementation hearing, and, if not, whether it denies due process. 2 The Court of Appeal held that section 366.26 does not authorize consideration of reunification as an option but that due process is satisfied because the issue may be raised by filing a petition pursuant to section 388 for modification or termination of jurisdiction based on changed circumstances. We agree and affirm the judgment.

Facts

Dependency petitions were filed in the Kern County Juvenile Court alleging that Marilyn H., age five, and Richard H., age seven, (minors) came within subdivision (a) of section 300 in that they would suffer serious physical harm or illness by the willful and negligent failure of Debbie H. (mother) to provide adequate food, clothing, shelter or medical treatment for them. The petitions alleged that the family had been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.