State Water Resources Control Board v. United States

Good Law
1988 Cal. LEXIS 36·243 Cal. Rptr. 887·44 Cal. 3d 448·749 P.2d 324·18 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20690
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 1988S.F. No. 25133California9,608 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Kaufman, J.

*454 Opinion

In this case we must decide whether the United States has California riparian water rights on federal land reserved for national forest purposes, and, if so, whether such rights are inherently “defeasible,” or subordinate to all other approved water uses. As to the first issue, we conclude that the federal government does have such riparian rights; as to the second, that those rights are no more defeasible than the riparian rights of other California landowners. The facts and the law underlying this controversy are set forth below.

Factual and Procedural Background

In August 1976, a private water rights claimant petitioned the State Water Resources Control Board (Board) for a determination of the rights of various claimants to the use of the waters of Hallett Creek Stream System in Lassen County. 1 After a preliminary investigation, the Board determined the public interest would be served by such a determination and granted the petition. (Wat. Code, § 2525.) Thereafter, various parties submitted proofs of claims to the water of Hallett Creek, including the United States acting on behalf of the United States Forest Service, a branch of the United States Department…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.