Romano

Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.

Bad Law
14 Cal. 4th 479·1996 Cal. LEXIS 6525·59 Cal. Rptr. 2d 20·96 Daily Journal DAR 15014·926 P.2d 1114
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1996No. S050290California9,205 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

George, J.

In this case we consider when the statute of limitations begins to run in a wrongful termination case in which the plaintiff has *484 alleged causes of action sounding in contract and tort, as well as violations of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.; FEHA.) The Court of Appeal concluded that the statute of limitations begins to run on all the alleged causes of action on the date employment actually is terminated, but defendant asserts, primarily on the basis of related federal authority, that the statute of limitations should run from the date the employee is informed unequivocally that his or her employment will be terminated. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the Court of Appeal was correct, and that its judgment should be affirmed.

I

Plaintiff William P. Romano was employed by defendant Rockwell International, Inc. (Rockwell) for 29 years. His last position with the company was as the director of human resources of Rockwell’s digital communications division. He generally received excellent performance reviews. He was aware beginning in 1987, however, that he had displeased Gilbert Amelio, president of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.