Garcia

Garcia v. McCutchen

Bad Law
16 Cal. 4th 469·1997 Cal. LEXIS 4414·66 Cal. Rptr. 2d 319·97 Daily Journal DAR 10553·1997 WL 461984
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 14, 1997No. S052920California5,350 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chin, J.

In this case, we consider the scope of a trial court’s power to dismiss an action for noncompliance with local court rules implementing the 1990 Trial Court Delay Reduction Act (Act) (Gov. Code, § 68600 et seq.). We conclude that, under the governing statutes, a court may not impose this sanction if noncompliance is the responsibility of counsel, not of the litigant. Therefore, we affirm the Court of Appeal judgment, which reversed the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s action.

Facts

In April 1993, plaintiff Danny Garcia filed a complaint in the Fresno County Superior Court seeking damages for injuries he received during an altercation at Henry’s Cantina, a cocktail lounge in Clovis, California. The complaint alleged claims for personal injury, general negligence, premises liability, and intentional tort, and named, among other defendants, Fern and *472 David Avila, individually and doing business as Henry’s Cantina (collectively the Avilas). On June 28, 1993, the clerk of the court served on Garcia’s counsel, Tomas Nunez, a notice of failure to comply with former rule 5.4A of the Superior Court of Fresno County Rules, 1 which required a plaintiff to serve the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.