Dudugjian

Dudugjian v. State Bar

Good Law
1991 Cal. LEXIS 562·278 Cal. Rptr. 90·52 Cal. 3d 1092·91 Daily Journal DAR 2171·804 P.2d 715
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 21, 1991No. S015185California3,107 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

In these consolidated proceedings under section 6083, subdivision (a), of the Business and Professions Code and rule 952(a) of the California Rules of Court, we review the decision of the State Bar recommending that petitioners Robert Paul Dudugjian and Thomas Mack Holliday (hereafter sometimes petitioners) be disciplined for a single instance of professional misconduct involving the handling and retaining of client funds.

A panel of the Hearing Department of the State Bar Court (hereafter the hearing panel or panel) recommended that petitioners be publicly reproved on condition of restitution and the successful taking of the Professional Responsibility Examination.

The Review Department of the State Bar Court (hereafter the review department) recommended that Dudugjian be suspended from the practice of law for two years, that his suspension be stayed, and that he be placed on probation for two years on conditions including actual suspension for ninety days and joint restitution with Holliday. It also recommended that Holliday be suspended for one year, that his suspension be stayed, and that he be placed on probation for one year on conditions including actual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.