Zamora

Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.

Good Law
121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 187·2002 Cal. LEXIS 3794·2002 Daily Journal DAR 6766·28 Cal. 4th 249·47 P.3d 1056
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 17, 2002No. S100352California4,390 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brown, J.

*252 Opinion

This appeal arises out of a typo. In typing up an offer to compromise pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 998 1 (section 998 offer), an attorney’s legal assistant types the word “against” instead of the phrase “in favor of.” As a result, the typed document mistakenly offers to settle the matter for a judgment against the attorney’s client in the amount of $149,999. Not surprisingly, the opposing party jumps at the offer. We now consider whether the party who made the erroneous section 998 offer may obtain relief pursuant to the discretionary relief provision of section 473, subdivision (b), and conclude he may.

Facts

Pablo Zamora (Zamora), doing business as Creative Engineering and Fabrication, filed suit against Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc. (Clayborn), alleging breach of contract and other related claims. The complaint alleged that Clayborn failed to pay for road signs produced and supplied by Zamora and sought approximately $143,000 in damages plus attorney fees. Clayborn answered and filed a cross-complaint. Although the cross-complaint did not specify the amount of damages sought, Clayborn sent Zamora an invoice for approximately $157,000 before…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.