Brown

People v. Brown

Good Law
15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 624·2004 Cal. LEXIS 6275·2004 Daily Journal DAR 8394·33 Cal. 4th 382·93 P.3d 244
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 12, 2004No. S087243California8,294 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Brown, J.

A jury convicted defendant John George Brown, Jr., of first degree murder, found true the special circumstance allegation of intentionally killing a peace officer engaged in the performance of his duties, and returned a verdict of death. On automatic appeal, this court affirmed the judgment in its entirety. (People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ] (Brown I).) On petition for writ of habeas corpus, however, we found Brady error (Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 [ 10 L.Ed.2d 215 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 ]) in the prosecution’s failure to disclose that the result of a radioactive immunoassay of a blood sample taken from defendant shortly after the crimes was positive for phencyclidine. (In re Brown (1998) 17 Cal.4th 873 [ 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 698 , 952 P.2d 715 ].)

On retrial, a jury again convicted defendant of first degree murder and found true the special circumstance allegation. (See Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(7); all undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) 1 The second jury also returned a death verdict. This appeal is automatic. (Cal. Const, art. VI, § 11; Pen. Code, § 1239.) We find no reversible error and affirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.