People v. Richardson

Bad Law
2008 Cal. LEXIS 6208·43 Cal. 4th 959·77 Cal. Rptr. 3d 163·183 P.3d 1146
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMay 22, 2008No. S029588California31,974 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Moreno, J.

Defendant Charles Keith Richardson was convicted by a jury of the murder of April Holley (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)), as to which the jury found true felony-murder special circumstances for burglary, rape, sodomy and lewd and lascivious acts on a child under the age of 14. (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(17).) The jury also convicted defendant of residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), forcible rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)), lewd and lascivious acts on a child under 14 (Pen. Code, § 288, subd. (b)), and sodomy (Pen. Code, § 286, subd. (c)), all of these counts also involving the murder victim, April Holley. 1 In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court found true additional allegations that defendant had suffered prior convictions for a serious felony and a sex offense. (Pen. Code, §§ 667, 667.6, subd. (b).) The *971 jury returned a death verdict for the murder. The trial court declined to modify the verdict (Pen. Code, § 190.4, subd. (e)), and sentenced defendant to death. 2 This appeal is automatic. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 11, subd. (a); § 1239, subd. (b).)

We affirm the judgment but, for the reasons given below, remand the case on the issue of restitution.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.