Prospect Medical Group, Inc. v. Northridge Emergency Medical Group

Good Law
45 Cal. 4th 497
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 2009No. S142209California4,588 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chin, J.

A health maintenance organization (HMO) commonly manages medical care in California. In the typical model, familiar to many, doctors contract to provide medical care to enrolled HMO members. Members generally use the services of one of the contracting doctors. When they do, and except for copayments the members must make when services are rendered, the HMO (or its delegate) pays the doctor under the existing contract. In this way, the parties agree upon, and know in advance, what their obligations and rights are and who must pay, and how much, for medical care.

The typical payment model sometimes breaks down, however, in the case of emergency care. In an emergency, an HMO member goes to the nearest hospital emergency room for treatment. The emergency room doctors at that hospital may or may not have previously contracted with the HMO to provide care to its members. In that situation, the doctors are statutorily required to provide emergency care without regard to the patient’s ability to pay. Additionally, when the patient is a member of an HMO, the HMO is statutorily required to pay for the emergency care. 1 For HMO members, it is always clear in advance who has to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.