Morenhout

Morenhout v. Brown

Good Law
1 Cal. Unrep. 139
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJune 6, 1864No. 3927California2,859 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sawyer, J.

We are of the opinion that the facts stated in the complaint do not constitute a cause of action against Brown. The presumption is that the pleader will state the facts in the light most favorable to himself, and for this reason the allegations of the complaint must be construed most strongly against the plaintiff.

The allegations of the complaint represent the plaintiff as taking an active part in the transactions set out, but we must construe his acts with reference to his relations to the subject matter of the contract, and viewing them in this light, we think the facts stated do not present the plaintiff and defendant in the relation of contracting parties, as to each other. It is true the plaintiff is in form embraced in the allegations relating to the transactions between the Bernals and Brown as though he was an actor in his own right, but the facts alleged show that he had no interest in the subject matter of the sale *141 from the Bernals to Brown. IIis action was clearly bnly in the character of agent in the negotiations between the Bernals and Brown. His relations as party in interest were with the Bernals, who were the owners of the lands described in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.