Decker

Decker v. Hughes

Good Law
1 Cal. Unrep. 193
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1865No. 458California1,081 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shafter, J.

Replevin to recover the possession of two billiard tables. It was admitted that the tables belonged originally to the plaintiff, but the defendant claimed that they had become his property by purchase before the bringing of the action. The contract under which the defendant claimed was made by the plaintiff with one Clayton, and was as follows:

This contract was signed and sealed by both parties.

It appeared that R. H. Vance was general agent of plaintiff, and had authority to do anything in the way of making contracts for him — plaintiff residing in New York. That on the 5th of July, 1862, the plaintiff brought suit against Clayton for one hundred dollars, for the rent mentioned in the agreement set out in the answer, for the month of July, 1862, and recovered a judgment for said amount and costs, amounting to one hundred and eleven dollars and fifty cents, which was paid by Clayton. That Clayton thereafter assigned all his rights and claims of every kind under and by virtue of said agreement, and said payment under said judgment, to the defendant, and plaintiff had notice thereof. That after said assignment, plaintiff’s agent delivered to Clayton (who informed him he had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.