Bender
Bender v. Palmer
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Wallace, J.
— The plaintiff, a materialman, furnished to Calderwood certain materials intended to be and in fact subsequently used by the latter in the erection of a building upon a town lot in Santa Cruz, of which he was at the time in possession, claiming to be the owner.
This action is brought to foreclose the lien asserted by the plaintiff under the statute of April 26, 1862, in relation to liens of mechanics and others. After the materials had been furnished, and while the building was being erected, or, it may have been, after its actual completion, Calderwood sold the premises to Dreman, who subsequently conveyed them to the defendant Maria.
The court below entered a decree directing a sale of the premises to satisfy the lien, and from this decree the defendant appeals.
That Bender furnished the materials and filed his sworn statement, correctly setting forth his claim, is not questioned here, but the point is made that his lien became lost, because, as is said, this filing was not done within thirty days after the *602 completion of the building — but was done before the building was completed at all.
It is-argued that the fact of completion -must have occurred before the right to…