Himmelmann

Himmelmann v. Reay

Good Law
1 Cal. Unrep. 615
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 22, 1870No. 1666California304 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Temple, J.

— Action for street assessment. The lots upon which it is sought to establish a lien by this action were assessed to unknown owners. In such cases the only demand necessary to be made under the warrant of assessment is a public demand on the premises assessed, and the return to the warrant shows that such demand was made in this case: Stats. 1863, p. 529, see. 11.

The dollar mark is placed before the amount in the footing of the assessment-roll, and this sufficiently indicates the character of the figures, the amount of which is there stated.

The answer avers that the owners of the major part of the frontage of the lots of land liable to be assessed under the contract of the plaintiff, within five days after the publication of the award to plaintiff’s assignor entered into a contract to do the whole of the said work at the price at which it had been awarded, and avers the execution of a written contract and a bond, as required by law, and that they commenced work and prosecuted the same with due diligence, until they were prevented by the superintendent and the plaintiff’s assignor. On the trial evidence was introduced tending to establish these facts. After several witnesses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.