Lux

Lux v. Haight

Good Law
1 Cal. Unrep. 622
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 28, 1870No. 2206California345 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sprague, J.

— By tbe statute under winch, petitioner claims his patent at the hands of the governor, the first affirmative act required of the governor, on presentation to him of a certificate of purchase from the register of the state land office, is to proceed and determine whether “the land or part of the land designated in said'certificate belongs or has been confirmed to the state and the whole amount of purchase money, together with interest, thereon has been paid,” and if he shall find as to these facts in the affirmative, then he is required to issue a patent for said land: Stats. 1858, p. 200, sec. 7.

This application is for a peremptory mandate to the governor to issue a patent to the petitioner, and his petition does not allege that the governor has found these prerequisite facts necessary to authorize him to issue a patent under the law. It is not alleged that the governor refuses to act in the matter of determining these prerequisite facts, nor is a mandate sought for the purpose of compelling him to act in the matter of determining them, but to compel the governor to perform *623 a final act, which the law only authorizes to be performed by him, after he shall have found and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.