Lawrence
Lawrence v. Nunan
2 Cal. Unrep. 221
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 16, 1883No. 7693California56 words
Lead Opinion
The question involved in this case is, whether, upon the sale of the property from Watkins to Bagnasco, there was an actual and continued change of pos *222 session, within the meaning and intent of the statute. The evidence upon that subject was conflicting, but there was sufficient to sustain the finding.
Judgment and order affirmed.