Gilman

Gilman v. Curtis

Good Law
1884 Cal. LEXIS 772·2 Cal. Unrep. 274·3 P. 114
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1884California661 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ross, J.

To this suit Gilbert Curtis and the JEtna Life Insurance Company were originally made defendants. The controversy grows out of a policy of insurance issued by the company upon the life of one A. W. Tucker. The complaint charges that the policy was issued upon the life of Tucker and delivered to one Esther Cordelia Curtis, who, it is alleged, paid the premiums thereon. It is not alleged to whom the policy was made payable. There are, however, allegations and findings to the effect that Esther Cordelia Curtis assigned the policy to the plaintiff, who subsequently caused the same to be assigned to the defendant Gilbert Curtis as security for certain advances to be made by him for and on account of the said Esther Cordelia Curtis. The findings are that the advances so made, for the security of which Gilbert Curtis received the policy, amounted to $4,071.21. There is nothing in the case to show that the plaintiff became personally responsible for those advances. The prayer of the complaint is for a decree to the effect that the plaintiff is the owner of the policy, and entitled to collect and receive from the insurance company the money for which it was issued, the insured having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.