Snow

Snow v. Supervisors

Good Law
2 Cal. Unrep. 445·6 P. 90
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1885No. 9944California84 words

Lead Opinion

In this case the petitioner can bring his action for the writ of mandate in the superior court for the county above named. The reasons assigned for not bringing it in that court are insufficient, as there has been a change of the judge of that court since the judgment was rendered in the contésted election case of Reynolds v. Snow. In accordance with the rule of this court the petitioner must seek his remedy in the superior court.

Application denied, and proceedings dismissed.