Rosborough

Rosborough v. Boardman

Good Law
2 Cal. Unrep. 456·6 P. 449
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 27, 1885No. 9947California322 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

If there was not, immediately preceding the date of the passage of the act to “establish a uniform system of county and township governments” (approved March 14, 1883), any such office as that of “county assessor of Alameda county,” there is not any such office now, unless *457 it was created by some provision of that act; and if such' an office was created by any provision of that act, such provision did not take effect prior to the first Monday after the first day of January, 1885, as clearly appears by section 181: “Any provision of this act, creating a county office in any county, shall not (except for election purposes) take effect prior to the first Monday after the first day of January, eighteen hundred and eighty-five”: Stats. & Amend. Codes 1883, p. 365.

The petitioner’s alleged appointment was made prior to the first day of January, 1885, and before any provision of the act of March 14, 1883, “creating a county office” in Alameda county, had taken effect. Petitioner, however, insists that the act of February 10, 1874, which abolished the office of county assessor of Alameda county and created township assessors therein, was repealed by section 4109, Political Code,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.