White

White v. Douglass

Good Law
1885 Cal. LEXIS 874·2 Cal. Unrep. 574·8 P. 801
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 26, 1885No. 9612California1,090 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action to determine a contest between applicants for the purchase of land from the state of California, as provided for under sections 341J-3416 of the Political Code. The cause was tried by the court, a jury having been waived, and judgment was rendered upon written findings in favor of plaintiff!, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. It is objected to the first finding of the court that the evidence shows without conflict that no purchase of the land described in the complaint, or any portion thereof, was made by plaintiff: from Pico, but that an agreement was made to purchase over one thousand acres of land, including the land in controversy, provided the claim of Pico to the Moquelemos grant was confirmed by the supreme court of the United States; that plaintiff was in *575 possession long before the date of sneh contract, and had improved the land prior thereto, and that neither his entry nor improvements were made under said contract. The finding of fact, standing by itself, seems liable to the criticism aimed at it, but when taken in connection with other facts, as found by the court, the reason of the objection fails.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.