Peterson
Peterson v. Doe
Lead Opinion
Morrison, J.
This action was brought for the recovery of one thousand and forty dollars and ten cents for the wrongful conversion by defendants of certain railroad ties, the property of the plaintiff. The case was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury, and the following are the findings of fact and the conclusions of law upon which judgment was rendered for the plaintiff:
A motion was made for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is from the judgment and order.
There is no seriously contested question of law in the case, but the contention is that some of the findings are not supported by the evidence. A careful examination of the transcript in' the case fails to support the contention of the appellants. We think there was sufficient evidence to justify the findings, and on such findings the judgment properly passed for plaintiff. It is sufficient to say that, upon the main points in the case, there was a substantial conflict in the evidence, and in such cases it is the well-settled rule that this court will not interfere with the judgment. Judgment and order affirmed.
We concur: Myrick, J.; Thornton, J.