Gates

Gates v. McLean

Good Law
1886 Cal. LEXIS 887·2 Cal. Unrep. 636·9 P. 938
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 1886No. 9926California686 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Searls, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover certain lots of land in the town of Modesto. Plaintiff had *637 judgment, from which, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. The demurrer to the complaint was properly overruled. The pleading demurred to avers ownership of the property in plaintiff, the making of a contract for the sale thereof to defendant, payment of three hundred dollars on account of the purchase price by defendant, his entry into possession, tender of a deed, demand of payment, and refusal to pay, rescission of the contract by plaintiff, notice thereof and tender to defendant of the money paid, with interest, and demand of possession, which was refused. If the allegations of the complaint are true, plaintiff on his part had kept and performed all the covenants of the agreement to sell, by him to be kept and performed, and defendant had refused to pay the balance of the purchase price. This would entitle plaintiff to a specific performance of the contract, or to a rescission of the agreement and recovery in ejectment.

On the fifteenth day of August, 1881, plaintiff executed and delivered to defendant an agreement in the following language:

*638 On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.