Pico
Pico v. Williams
2 Cal. Unrep. 671·11 P. 600
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 2, 1886No. 11,680California81 words
Lead Opinion
We are of opinion that, from the facts stated in the petition, the petitioner is not entitled to a writ of prohibition. The request of the governor, as set forth in the petition, was sufficient authority for Judge Williams to hold a superior court in the county of Los Angeles. It is therefore unnecessary to consider any, issue raised by the answer of respondent.
The application for a writ of prohibition is denied, and the alternative writ heretofore issued is annulled.