Richards

Richards v. Donner

Good Law
2 Cal. Unrep. 675·11 P. 770
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 12, 1886No. 9579California1,273 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Foote, J.

This action was originally brought by A. W. Peck, in his lifetime (for whom his executor, Richards, has been substituted), for the purpose of canceling a deed of gift made by said Peek to the defendant, M. E. Donner, while he was in such an enfeebled mental condition, and so circumstanced in his surroundings, as that he did not understand or appreciate the nature, effects, and consequences of the execution and delivery of that deed. A judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and from that, and an order denying her a new trial, the defendant has appealed. ■

Several points are presented by appellant for consideration; but in the view we take of the case, as hereinafter set forth, it is unnecessary to pass upon them.

The court found, in substance, as grounds for rendering judgment for the plaintiff, that A. W. Peek, while a visitor at the house of the defendant’s mother, where the defendant resided on the twelfth day of April, 1882, received a severe paralytic stroke, which greatly weakened his physical and mental faculties; that while in such condition, on the twentieth day of April, 1882, still sojourning in the house of defendant’s mother, he proposed to make a will of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.