State v. Folsom Water Co.

Good Law
2 Cal. Unrep. 704·12 P. 388
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 1886No. 11,174California47 words

Lead Opinion

We are of opinion that the deed from the Natoma Water & Mining Company to the state did not impose an obligation upon the company to proceed to the completion of the canal. Therefore the ruling of the court below on the demurrer was correct. Judgment affirmed.