Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. Richardson

Good Law
1886 Cal. LEXIS 879·2 Cal. Unrep. 722·12 P. 343
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 30, 1886No. 11,509California990 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Foote, J.

This action was brought with a view of obtaining a judgment affirming to the plaintiff the whole of the right, title, and interest in and to certain waters mentioned in the complaint, as well as to the pipe which conducted said waters over the defendants1’ land, as also to the waterworks *725 and appurtenances thereto belonging. An injunction was prayed for, restraining the defendants from tapping the pipe and taking water therefrom, or in any other manner interfering with or diverting the same.

The defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and then they answered, stating substantially that they owned a certain tract of land over which the pipe was conducted, and were entitled to take a sufficient amount of water therefrom to irrigate said land, and that such privilege they have exercised for more than sixteen years, adversely, openly, notoriously, and uninterruptedly, under a claim of right. And with a view, evidently, to show an estoppel in pais as to the plaintiff’s right to dispute the defendants’ claim as aforesaid, the answer sets forth, in brief, this state of facts:

That before Richardson, one of the defendants, purchased the land upon which he claims the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.