Farnum

Farnum v. Hefner

Good Law
1888 Cal. LEXIS 988·2 Cal. Unrep. 831·16 P. 324
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 25, 1888No. 12,351California620 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Foote, J.

This is an action to recover the value of certain wheat and hay claimed to be the property of Farnum, and alleged to have been converted to his own use by Hefner. The plaintiff recovered judgment for the value of the wheat. A motion for a new trial was made and denied, and from the order made in the premises an appeal has been taken. The facts of the case are that on October 15, 1884, the plaintiff was the owner of certain farming land in Butte county, and at that date made a written lease of the same to one D. L. Butler for a term of two years. On February 24, 1885, Hefner, the defendant herein, recovered a judgment against Butler in the superior court of Butte county for a considerable sum of money, and had execution duly issued and levied upon the leasehold interest held by Butler, which was afterward sold under that writ, and purchased by the defendant. Thereupon he entered into possession of the land which Butler had leased, and proceeded to harvest the crop of growing wheat thereon. After the grain was sacked, and the defendant in possession of the whole of it, he offered the plaintiff one-third of it, which, after at first refusing, he afterward received. The defendant kept…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.