McDonald
McDonald v. Huff
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Temple, J.
In 1882, plaintiff had a judgment against the defendant Huff, and also held a note given by him, secured by a mortgage. He threatened to foreclose the mortgage, and finally agreed with Huff that Huff should convey to plaintiff the mortgaged premises, in consideration whereof the plaintiff would release Pluff from all the indebtedness. The agreement was reduced to writing, and is signed by Huff only. In it Huff recites his indebtedness of three thousand five hundred dollars on the mortgage and *861 six hundred dollars on the judgment, and then proceeds as follows: “And whereas, I am at present unable to pay said sums at present, in full, in cash, but am desirous to satisfy said demands; and whereas, the said John E. McDonald is willing that I should make to him a conveyance of the land described in said deed, and in consideration of said conveyance release and discharge me from all of said indebtedness, and from all indebtedness due and owing from me to him; and whereas, the said John E. McDonald is also willing that I should retain said land, and that said deed of conveyance be held in escrow by B. H. McDonald, of the Pacific Bank, of San Francisco, Cal., until November 21, 1882,…