Hanson

Hanson v. Hanson

Good Law
1889 Cal. LEXIS 1089·3 Cal. Unrep. 66·20 P. 736
Supreme Court of CaliforniaMarch 11, 1889No. 11,494California833 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hayne, J.

Appeal from an order setting aside an order vacating a judgment by default. The action was for divorce. No answer having been put in, the default of the defendant was entered, and after evidence had been taken a decree of divorce was made. After more than a year from the entry of this decree the defendant moved, upon notice, to have the decree set aside upon the ground that she had never been served with summons. This motion was granted; and it must be assumed from the record that it was granted upon the *67 ground upon which it was made, viz., that there had been no service of summons upon the defendant. About three weeks after this the court made a second order setting aside the first order. The ground upon which this second order was made does not appear from the record. But it is stated by the counsel for the respondent that it was made upon the ground that more than a year had elapsed between the entry of the decree and the motion to set it aside, and that therefore the defendant could not have it set aside upon motion, but was obliged to resort to an action; in other words, that the court had no power to act in the way it did. But we think that the court had such power. If…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.