Knight

United Land Ass'n v. Knight

Good Law
3 Cal. Unrep. 211·23 P. 267
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 1890No. 12,748California4,997 words

Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Thornton, J.

I concur in the judgment, and will file an opinion hereafter.

I dissent: McFarland, J.

Lead Opinion

Paterson, J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover a block of land lying below ordinary high tide in the city and county of San Francisco, and being a portion of that part of San Francisco known as “Mission creek lands.” The defendant claims under a patent of the United States to the city, issued June 20, 1884, in satisfaction of a pueblo grant of four square leagues, which was confirmed by the decree of the United States circuit court, May 18, 1865. The tract confirmed by this decree is described as “a tract situated within the county of San Francisco and embracing so much of the extreme upper portion of the peninsula above ordinary high-water mark (as the same existed at the date of the conquest of the country, viz., 7th of July, 1846), on which the city of San Francisco is situated, as will contain an area of four square leagues; said tract being bounded on the north and east by the bay of San Francisco, on the west by the Pacific ocean, and on the south by a due east and west line drawn so as to include the area aforesaid”—subject, however, to certain deductions for lands previously reserved or dedicated to public use by the United States. Under the decree referred to, a survey was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.