Ellis

Ellis v. Woodburn

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 1167·3 Cal. Unrep. 288·24 P. 893
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 2, 1890No. 13,533California1,669 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Vanclief, J.

The plaintiff is an attorney at law, and brought this action to recover a balance of $1,000, alleged to be due him from- the defendant for professional services. The ease was tried by a jury, and the trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $1,000. The defendant appeals from the judgment, and also from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The complaint consists of two counts for services rendered in defense of an action prosecuted by the Lake Valley Railroad Company,.a corporation, against this defendant, to condemn a right of way over defendant’s land, and in conducting negotiations for a compromise of that action. The first count is for the recovery of quantum meruit for such services, alleging them to have been reasonably worth $1,500, and that only $500 had been paid, and praying judgment for the balance of $1,000. The second count is for the recovery of a contingent fee of $1,000 in addition to the $500 admitted to have been paid upon an alleged express agreement between the plaintiff and defendant, to the effect that plaintiff was to defend the action to condemn defendant’s land, and at the same time to assist defendant to compromise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.