Taylor

Taylor v. Ford

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 1183·3 Cal. Unrep. 297·24 P. 942
Supreme Court of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1890No. 12,982California881 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

This action was brought by the appellant under section 1050 of the Code of Civil Procedure, alleging in his complaint, in substance, that the respondent was making an adverse claim for money against him, on a pretended obligation, to wit, a promissory note; that the exact nature of the claim was unknown to the plaintiff; that no suit had been brought on said claim; that he desired that said claim be brought forward and determined; and praying that the defendant “be compelled to set forth the nature and extent of said claim, and the particulars thereof, in a concise form, and that any cause of action that he pretends to have be fully alleged against this plaintiff, and that thereupon the same be determined by this court to be of no force and validity, and that the plaintiff have judgment against the defendant; that the defendant take nothing under said claim; and that the plaintiff recover costs.” The defendant answered by alleging that the plaintiff was indebted to him in the sum of $2,660.44, on a promissory note, a copy of which note is set out in the answer. This answer is, in legal effect, the same as an ordinary complaint on a promissory note, and prays for judgment in like…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.