Barry

Barry v. Goad

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 1179·3 Cal. Unrep. 302·24 P. 1023
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 6, 1890No. 12,984California818 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Foote, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff, a resident citizen of California, of the city and county of San Francisco, and a tax-payer, for the purpose of restraining the defendants, the board of education of the city and county of San Francisco, from drawing any drafts upon the school fund of the said city and county in favor of Laura T. Fowler and J. G. Kennedy, as compensation for their services as teachers in the public schools of said city and county. The cause was tried before the court, without a jury, and there is no bill of exceptions or statement on motion for a new trial. Upon the complaint and answer, apparently, the court found—First, that the allegations of the complaint were not sufficient in law to entitle the plaintiff to any relief or judgment; second, that all the affirmative allegations in defendants’ answer were true. Judgment passed for the defendants, from which this appeal is taken. The whole matter turns upon the question as to whether the board of education had the power to appoint, and order paid out of the school fund, Fowler and Kennedy, as inspecting teachers, and this depends upon the language of the statute, which is the measure of their power to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.