Herberger

Herberger v. Husmann

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 1173·3 Cal. Unrep. 304·24 P. 1058
Supreme Court of CaliforniaNovember 7, 1890No. 14,012California1,473 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

The parties to this action entered into a con tract for the sale by the appellant to the respondent of certain real estate, $1,500 of the purchase money to be paid at the time the contract was executed, and $1,000, the balance of the purchase money, at the end of one year, at which, time a deed for the property was to be executed. The contract was in the usual form of such agreements, except that it contained this clause: “And it is further agreed by and between the parties hereto that, should the party of the second part become dissatisfied with the purchase of said lots at the end of one year from date hereof, then, and in that event, should the said party of the second part so desire, the said party of the first part hereby agrees to return to said party of the second part the amount of money this day paid on said lots by the party of the second part, with interest thereon at the rate of ten per cent per annum, provided said party of the second part gives said party of the first part thirty days’ notice, and a surrender to said party of the first part of the title to said lots; but, should the party of the second part not notify the party of the first part, as agreed, then this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.