Windhaus

Windhaus v. Bootz

Good Law
1890 Cal. LEXIS 1180·3 Cal. Unrep. 351·25 P. 404
Supreme Court of CaliforniaDecember 30, 1890No. 12,991California918 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Works, J.

This was a suit by a judgment creditor to have declared fraudulent and void certain transfers of real property by the defendant Adam Bootz to his wife and children. The trial court gave judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

The court found that there was no fraudulent intent, and that the grantor was solvent and able to pay his debts at the time the deeds were made. Whether this finding was sustained by the evidence or not is the only question necessary to examine.

It was admitted at the trial that the deeds were deeds of gift; and the evidence shows, without conflict, that at the time of their execution the donor was indebted to one Severin in the sum of $1,000. Subsequently Severin became in need of money, and borrowed $1,000 from the plaintiff, and it was agreed between the parties that the indebtedness of the donor to Severin should be transferred to the plaintiff, and that due from Severin to the plaintiff should be released. This was done, but, instead of the old note being transferred to the plaintiff, the donor made a payment to her of $200, and gave a new note for the balance, viz., $800. The form of the indebtedness was changed, and the amount was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.