Hinckley

Hinckley v. Stebbins

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 1024·3 Cal. Unrep. 478·29 P. 52
Supreme Court of CaliforniaFebruary 2, 1892No. 13,746California1,748 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Foote, J.

This suit was brought by the plaintiff, as residuary legatee under the will of William C. Hinckley, deceased, against the defendants, for the purpose of securing an accounting, procuring the sale of certain property, the payment of certain unpaid legacies out of the proceeds of that sale, and to obtain a division of the balance left in their hands between the residuary legatee and some of these defendants, as trustees of a certain charity. There had been a contest as to the construction of this will, and what proportion of the estate was to be distributed to the parties here, and this court, in 58 Cal. 517 , adjudicated the matters there involved, and ordered a probate court decree of distribution to be made, modifying a previous one made on the 10th of March, 1879, which decree, modified as directed by the appellate court, was *479 made and entered on the 22d of May, 1882. This last decree has never been appealed from, and is in full force and effect. It is prayed in the complaint that the California Theater property, which had been by that decree distributed to certain of the defendants here, in trust for certain purposes, should be sold, and that from the proceeds of that sale,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.