Rising

Rising v. Gibbs

Good Law
1892 Cal. LEXIS 1053·3 Cal. Unrep. 506·30 P. 589
Supreme Court of CaliforniaAugust 1, 1892No. 14,715California369 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Foote, J.

This action is to set aside and cancel a deed, which it is alleged the defendant without plaintiff’s consent fraudulently abstracted from a safe, where it had been deposited in escrow by the plaintiff pending the completion of a proposed sale of the land described therein to the defendant. It is further alleged in the complaint that, after getting possession of the deed in this fraudulent manner, the defendant kept it and caused it to be recorded; that no money was ever paid for the purchase of the property; that the defendant refused and still refuses to pay the consideration of the deed so fraudulently obtained and recorded, or restore the property by reconveyance to plaintiff. It is prayed that the deed be ordered delivered to plaintiff and canceled. As will be readily seen, the action is in its nature to quiet the title of the plaintiff to his property, by ordering a deed to be canceled which has surreptitiously and fraudulently come to the possession of the defendant, and had been recorded by him to *507 the injury of the plaintiff. We think the facts set out in the complaint show a good cause of action, and that the demurrer was properly overruled.

The point is made that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.