Janes

Janes v. De Azevedo

Good Law
3 Cal. Unrep. 556·30 P. 1104
Supreme Court of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1892No. 14,875California353 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

McFarland, J.

This action was brought against a large number of defendants to compel each of them to convey to plaintiff the legal title to the undivided one-fifth of the part of a certain tract of land which each defendant claims to hold. Judgment was rendered for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment upon the judgment-roll alone, there being no bill of exceptions or statement. The answer of the defendants sets up several valid defenses; the findings of the court fully support those defenses; the conclusion of law is that the plaintiff should take nothing by his complaint, and that defendants should be dismissed with their costs; and the conclusion of law is amply warranted by the findings of fact. Moreover, the answer avers that the alleged causes of action stated in the complaint are barred by the provisions of several named sections of the Code of Civil Procedure, between sections 318 and 343; and the court finds that they were barred by the sections named. And as there is no evidence before us, and nothing in the record inconsistent with the finding as to the statute of limitations, this finding is itself conclusive of the case against appellant. We do not deem it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.